ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Analisi della Modularità Diretta×Centralità di intermediazione×
CampoAnalisi delle retiAnalisi delle reti
FamigliaMachine learningMachine learning
Anno di origine20081977
IdeatoreLeicht, E. A. & Newman, M. E. J.Freeman, L. C.
TipoCommunity detection / graph partitioningCentrality measure
Fonte seminaleLeicht, E. A., & Newman, M. E. J. (2008). Community structure in directed networks. Physical Review Letters, 100(11), 118703. DOI ↗Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗
Aliasdirected community detection via modularity, directed Q-modularity, digraph modularity optimization, Leicht-Newman modularityFreeman betweenness, BC, geodesic betweenness, shortest-path betweenness
Correlati56
SintesiDirected modularity analysis extends the classic Newman-Girvan modularity framework to directed graphs, where edges carry a source and a destination. Formalized by Leicht and Newman in 2008, it partitions nodes into communities by maximizing a modularity score that accounts for each node's separate in-degree and out-degree in the null model, making it the standard approach for community detection in citation networks, information flows, and other asymmetric relational data.Betweenness centrality, formalized by Linton C. Freeman in 1977, measures how often a node lies on the shortest path connecting every other pair of nodes in a network. High-betweenness nodes act as bridges or brokers: removing them fragments the network into disconnected components more severely than removing any other nodes.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: Directed Modularity Analysis · Betweenness Centrality. Consultato il 2026-06-15 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare