Confronta i metodi
Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.
| Teoria Fondata Straussian Digitale× | Teoria Ancorata Costruttivista× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Qualitativo | Qualitativo |
| Famiglia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anno di origine≠ | 1990 (Strauss & Corbin foundational); digital adaptation 2000s–2010s | 2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967) |
| Ideatore≠ | Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (foundational GT); adapted to digital contexts by subsequent methodologists | Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967) |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative research design and analysis approach | Qualitative research method |
| Fonte seminale≠ | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803959408 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| Alias | digital GT (Straussian), Straussian GT in digital contexts, online Straussian grounded theory, digital Strauss-Corbin grounded theory | CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory |
| Correlati | 6 | 6 |
| Sintesi≠ | Digital Straussian grounded theory applies the systematic, coding-driven approach of Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory to digital data sources such as online forums, social media, chat logs, and digital documents. It retains the Straussian paradigm model and three-stage coding structure — open, axial, and selective — while adapting sampling strategies, theoretical saturation criteria, and ethical protocols to the unique features of online and digital research environments. | Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated. |
| ScholarGateInsieme di dati ↗ |
|
|