ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Estensione Dual Hesitant Fuzzy di EDAS×Processo Gerarchico Analitico×Analytic Network Process (AHP con feedback e interdipendenze)×Metodo Best-Worst×BWM bayesiano×
CampoProcesso decisionaleProcesso decisionaleProcesso decisionaleProcesso decisionaleProcesso decisionale
FamigliaMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDM
Anno di origine20231980199620152020
IdeatoreNing, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X.Saaty, T. L.Saaty, T. L.Rezaei, J.Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J.
TipoDual Hesitant outranking/ranking — Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Element (DHFE: h(x) membership set, g(x) non-membership set)Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LPHierarchical Dirichlet posterior over weights via MCMC (JAGS) — group decision
Fonte seminaleNing, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. (2023). EDAS method for multiple attribute group decision making with probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy information and its application to suppliers selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J. (2020). Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model. Omega DOI ↗
Alias
Correlati88888
SintesiDHF-EDAS (Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM-BAYESIAN (Bayesian BWM — Probabilistic Group Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: DHF-EDAS · AHP · ANP · BWM · BWM-BAYESIAN. Consultato il 2026-06-19 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare