ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Studio Epidemiologico Trasversale×Valutazione dei test di screening×
CampoEpidemiologiaEpidemiologia
FamigliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anno di origine1960s (formal codification); widely practiced since mid-20th century1968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
IdeatoreClassical epidemiology tradition; systematized by Brian MacMahon and Thomas Pugh (1960s)Wilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
TipoObservational, descriptive/analytic epidemiological designObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
Fonte seminaleKelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195080407Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
Aliasprevalence study, cross-sectional survey, transversal study, cross-sectional designscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
Correlati66
SintesiA cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the exposure(s) and outcome(s) of interest simultaneously in a defined population at a single point in time (or over a short period). Because there is no follow-up, it is the most efficient observational design for estimating disease prevalence and for generating hypotheses about associations between risk factors and health outcomes.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: Cross-sectional epidemiological study · Screening Test Evaluation. Consultato il 2026-06-17 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare