ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Valutazione Proporzionale Complessa×CILOS×
CampoProcesso decisionaleProcesso decisionale
FamigliaMCDMMCDM
Anno di origine19962016
IdeatoreZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TipoProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Fonte seminaleZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Alias
Correlati88
SintesiCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: COPRAS · CILOS. Consultato il 2026-06-15 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare