ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Congruence Analysis×Qualitative Comparative Analysis×
CampoPolitical SciencePolitical Science
FamigliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anno di origine20121987
IdeatoreAlexander L. George & Andrew Bennett; Joachim Blatter & Markus HaverlandCharles C. Ragin
TipoSmall-N, theory-centered case-study methodSet-theoretic, configurational comparative method
Fonte seminaleBlatter, J., & Haverland, M. (2012). Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 9780230249707Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN: 9780520058347
AliasCongruence method, Congruence procedure, Theory-centered case study, Predicted-observed congruence testingQCA, csQCA, fsQCA, Configurational comparative method
Correlati33
SintesiCongruence analysis is a small-N, theory-centered case-study method that adjudicates between competing theories by comparing each theory's concrete predictions with the empirical observations in one or a few cases. The researcher derives specific, observable expectations from each rival theory and then assesses which theory's predictions are most congruent with what is actually observed. Described as the congruence method by George and Bennett and developed into a full explanatory approach by Blatter and Haverland, it makes theories — rather than cases or variables — the central objects of inference.Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is a set-theoretic, configurational method that identifies which combinations of conditions are necessary or sufficient for an outcome across a set of cases. Developed by Charles Ragin, it treats each case as a configuration of set memberships, builds a truth table of all logically possible combinations, and uses Boolean algebra to minimize them into the simplest expressions that account for the outcome. It bridges qualitative case knowledge and cross-case generalization, embracing causal complexity through conjunctural causation, equifinality, and asymmetry.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: Congruence Analysis · Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Consultato il 2026-06-24 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare