Confronta i metodi
Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.
| Storia orale comparata× | Etnografia Comparativa× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Qualitativo | Qualitativo |
| Famiglia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anno di origine≠ | 1970s–1990s (oral history discipline; comparative application developed through 1990s) | 1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized) |
| Ideatore≠ | Alessandro Portelli, Paul Thompson (oral history tradition); comparative design adapted from cross-cultural qualitative research | George E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic) |
| Tipo | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Fonte seminale≠ | Portelli, A. (1991). The Death of Luigi Trastulli and Other Stories: Form and Meaning in Oral History. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404997 | Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | comparative oral history, cross-group oral history, comparative oral testimony, multi-site oral history | multi-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observation |
| Correlati | 6 | 6 |
| Sintesi≠ | Comparative oral history collects and systematically compares first-person spoken testimonies from two or more distinct groups, communities, or historical contexts. The method blends the interpretive depth of oral history — privileging personal memory and narrative — with the analytical logic of comparative design, enabling researchers to identify both shared patterns and meaningful differences across the groups under study. | Comparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone. |
| ScholarGateInsieme di dati ↗ |
|
|