Confronta i metodi
Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.
| Grounded Theory Comparativa× | Analisi Tematica Comparativa× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Qualitativo | Qualitativo |
| Famiglia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anno di origine≠ | 1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward | 2000s–2010s (as an explicit comparative variant of thematic analysis) |
| Ideatore≠ | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholars | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis foundation); comparative extension developed in applied policy and cross-cultural qualitative research traditions |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative analytical strategy |
| Fonte seminale≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | cross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysis | cross-group thematic analysis, comparative TA, multi-group thematic analysis, comparative qualitative thematic analysis |
| Correlati | 6 | 6 |
| Sintesi≠ | Comparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies. | Comparative Thematic Analysis applies the structured procedures of thematic analysis across two or more distinct groups, sites, or time points, with the explicit aim of identifying both shared patterns and meaningful differences. Rather than producing a single composite account of experience, it yields a layered analysis that maps where themes converge and diverge across comparison units — making it especially valuable for policy-relevant, cross-cultural, or multi-site qualitative studies. |
| ScholarGateInsieme di dati ↗ |
|
|