Confronta i metodi

	Processo Gerarchico Analitico	Metodo Condorcet	Metodo Copeland
Campo	Processo decisionale	Processo decisionale	Processo decisionale
Famiglia	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Anno di origine	1980	1900	1951
Ideatore	Saaty, T. L.	Marquis de Condorcet	Copeland, A. H.
Tipo	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Pairwise majority rule — winner beats every other alternative in pairwise contest	Pairwise majority rule (Condorcet-based aggregation)
Fonte seminale	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Marquis de Condorcet (1900). Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix (1785). Imprimerie Royale, Paris (original 1785)	Copeland, A. H. (1951). A 'reasonable' social welfare function. Mimeograph, University of Michigan Seminar on Applications of Mathematics to Social Sciences
Alias	—	—	—
Correlati	8	5	0
Sintesi	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	CONDORCET (Condorcet Method — Pairwise majority winner from ranked ballots) is a aggregationoperator multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Marquis de Condorcet in 1900. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	COPELAND (Copeland Method — Pairwise majority voting with net win-loss score) is a aggregationoperator multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Copeland, A. H. in 1951. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.