ScholarGate
Asisten
Process / pipelineSociology of scientific knowledge

Boundary-Work Analysis

Boundary-work analysis studies how the line between science and non-science is drawn, defended, and contested—not by philosophers laying down timeless criteria, but by actors doing rhetorical work to secure authority, resources, and credibility. Introduced by Thomas Gieryn in 1983 and elaborated in his 1999 book Cultural Boundaries of Science, the approach treats demarcation as a practical, strategic, and historically variable accomplishment. The method examines the discourse of demarcation episodes to reveal the strategies—expansion, expulsion, and protection of autonomy—through which the cultural map of science is redrawn whenever its credibility is on the line.

Buka di MethodMindSegeraTerapkan, bandingkan, dapatkan panduan
Alat & sumber daya
Unduh salindia
Belajar & jelajahi
VideoSegera

Baca metode selengkapnya

Khusus anggota

Masuk dengan akun gratis untuk membaca bagian ini.

Masuk

Peta metode

Lingkup metode terkait — pilih sebuah simpul untuk menjelajah.

Sumber

  1. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781-795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325
  2. Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226292625

Cara menyitasi halaman ini

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/id/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis

Metode yang mana?

Letakkan metode ini berdampingan dengan kerabat terdekatnya dan baca secara bersisian — pustaka menata bukunya di atas meja; pilihan ada di tangan Anda.

Bandingkan berdampingan

Dirujuk oleh

ScholarGateBoundary-Work Analysis (Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science)). Diakses 2026-06-24 dari https://scholargate.app/id/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis · Set data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026