Bandingkan metode

	Kerangka Kerja SPJ: Penilaian Risiko Berbasis Penilaian Profesional Terstruktur	HCR-20v3: Manajemen Risiko Klinis Historis-20
Bidang	Psikologi Forensik	Psikologi Forensik
Keluarga	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Tahun asal	2003	2013
Pencetus	Stephen D. Hart, Peter R. Kropp, David R. Laws	Kevin S. Douglas, Stephen D. Hart, Christopher D. Webster, et al.
Tipe	Clinician-Synthesized	Clinician-rated
Sumber perintis	Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press.	Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., Belfrage, H., Guy, L. S., & Wilson, C. M. (2013). HCR-20v3: Assessing risk for violence. Simon Fraser University Mental Health Law Program.
Alias	SPJ, Structured Professional Judgment, SPJ Framework	HCR-20v3, Historical Clinical Risk Management
Terkait	4	5
Ringkasan	The Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) framework represents a contemporary approach to forensic risk assessment that synthesizes clinical judgment with empirical evidence of risk factors. Rather than producing a numerical score, SPJ guides clinicians through systematic evaluation of case-specific evidence to arrive at a structured, transparent categorical risk judgment. SPJ has become the preferred methodology in many forensic settings globally and underlies instruments such as the HCR-20v3 (violence risk) and sexual offender assessment protocols.	The HCR-20v3 is a structured professional judgment framework developed by Douglas, Hart, and colleagues for the assessment of risk for violence among adolescents and adults in mental health, criminal justice, and forensic settings. Published in 2013, it represents the third version of one of the most widely validated risk assessment instruments in forensic psychology, synthesizing clinical judgment with empirical evidence of violence risk factors.