ScholarGate
Asisten

Bandingkan metode

Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.

Analisis Kode Statis×Metrik Kompleksitas Perangkat Lunak×
BidangRekayasa Perangkat LunakRekayasa Perangkat Lunak
KeluargaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Tahun asal20011976
PencetusDavid Engler and William PughThomas J. McCabe
Tipeautomated analysisquantitative measurement
Sumber perintisChess, B., & West, J. (2007). Secure Programming with Static Analysis. Addison-Wesley Professional. link ↗McCabe, T. J. (1976). A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2(4), 308–320. DOI ↗
Aliasstatic analysis, code inspection, automated reviewcode complexity analysis, complexity measurement
Terkait44
RingkasanStatic code analysis automatically examines source code without execution, detecting potential bugs, security vulnerabilities, code smells, and style violations. Pioneered by Engler and Pugh (2001), automated analysis tools scan codebases at scale, identifying defect patterns faster than manual review. Organizations integrate static analysis into continuous integration pipelines to prevent defects early.Software complexity metrics quantify the structural and operational difficulty of code through numerical measurements. Introduced by Thomas McCabe in 1976, cyclomatic complexity became the foundational approach. These metrics assess maintainability, testability, and defect risk, enabling teams to identify problematic code regions and guide refactoring efforts.
ScholarGateSet data
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sumber
  3. PUBLISHED

Ke halaman pencarian Download slides

ScholarGateBandingkan metode: Static Code Analysis · Software Complexity Metrics. Diakses 2026-06-15 dari https://scholargate.app/id/compare