Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Pembobotan PCA× | Penilaian Rasio Aditif× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Pengambilan Keputusan | Pengambilan Keputusan |
| Keluarga | MCDM | MCDM |
| Tahun asal≠ | 1901 | 2010 |
| Pencetus≠ | Pearson, K. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Tipe≠ | Weight_Objective (PCA variance explained, eigenvector-based) | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Pearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine DOI ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Terkait | 8 | 8 |
| Ringkasan≠ | PCA-WEIGHT (PCA Weighting — Principal Component Analysis based objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pearson, K. in 1901. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|