Bandingkan metode

	Instrumen Pemberdayaan Pasien	Skala Konflik Keputusan
Bidang	Perawatan Berpusat pada Pasien	Perawatan Berpusat pada Pasien
Keluarga	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Tahun asal	1998	1995
Pencetus	J. G. Howie	Annette O'Connor
Tipe	Patient-reported	Patient-reported
Sumber perintis	Howie, J. G., Heaney, D. J., Maxwell, M., & Zwanenberg, D. (1998). A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two other consultations outcome measures. British Journal of General Practice, 48(427), 1211-1216.	O'Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making, 15(1), 25-30.
Alias	PEI, Patient Enablement Score	DCS-16, Decisional Conflict Inventory
Terkait	4	4
Ringkasan	The Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) is a brief, validated six-item questionnaire that measures the degree to which a clinical consultation leaves the patient feeling more capable of understanding and managing their health condition. Developed by Howie and colleagues in 1998, the PEI assesses whether the consultation helped the patient understand their problem, cope with their illness, and manage their health more effectively. The scale captures the empowering effect of good clinical practice and is widely used in general practice research, quality improvement, and studies evaluating patient-centered and collaborative consultation styles.	The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is a 16-item self-reported outcome measure that quantifies the degree of uncertainty, value ambivalence, and decision distress experienced by patients facing healthcare choices. Developed by Annette O'Connor in 1995, the DCS assesses five core domains: personal uncertainty, understanding of options and outcomes, clarity of personal values, perceived social support, and confidence in making the decision. It has become the gold standard for measuring decisional conflict in healthcare research and clinical trials of decision support interventions.