Bandingkan metode

	Metode Campuran Pragmatis Berbasis Desain	Penelitian Tindakan
Bidang	Desain Penelitian	Penelitian Kualitatif
Keluarga	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Tahun asal	2000s–2010s	1946
Pencetus	Synthesised from Design-Based Research Collective (2003) and pragmatist mixed methods scholars (Creswell, Tashakkori, Teddlie)	Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury
Tipe	Mixed methods research design	Method
Sumber perintis	Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506386706	Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.
Alias	DBPMM, design-based mixed methods, pragmatic design-based research, educational design research with mixed methods	Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry
Terkait	2	1
Ringkasan	Design-based pragmatic mixed methods combines the iterative, intervention-focused logic of design-based research (DBR) with the philosophical pragmatism that underpins mixed methods inquiry. Researchers design, test, and refine an educational or organisational intervention across multiple cycles while simultaneously collecting quantitative outcome data and qualitative process data. The pragmatist worldview licenses the integration of both data strands in service of a practical research question: does this design work, for whom, and why?	Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.