Bandingkan metode

	Matriks Kebingungan	Koefisien Korelasi Matthews	Presisi	Recall (Sensitivitas)
Bidang	Evaluasi Model	Evaluasi Model	Evaluasi Model	Evaluasi Model
Keluarga	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Tahun asal	20th century	1975	20th century	20th century
Pencetus	Statistical foundations	Brian W. Matthews	Historical statistical foundations	Historical statistical foundations
Tipe	Evaluation visualization	Evaluation metric	Evaluation metric	Evaluation metric
Sumber perintis	Everitt, B. S., & Hothorn, T. (2005). A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC.	Matthews, B. W. (1975). Comparison of predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Protein Structure, 405(2), 442-451.	Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874.	Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874.
Alias	Error Matrix, Contingency Table	Phi Coefficient, Binary Classification Correlation	Positive Predictive Value, PPV	Sensitivity, True Positive Rate, TPR
Terkait	5	5	5	5
Ringkasan	The confusion matrix is a table that displays the counts of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. It provides a complete picture of where a classifier makes correct and incorrect predictions, enabling calculation of all other classification metrics.	The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) is a correlation measure between predicted and actual binary classifications. It ranges from -1 to 1 and is considered one of the most reliable single-score metrics for evaluating binary classifiers, especially on imbalanced datasets.	Precision measures the proportion of positive predictions that were actually correct. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases we predicted as positive, how many were truly positive?' Precision is critical in scenarios where false positives are costly.	Recall measures the proportion of actual positive cases that were correctly identified by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly positive, how many did we find?' Recall is critical in scenarios where missing positive cases is costly.