Bandingkan metode
Tinjau metode pilihan Anda berdampingan; baris yang berbeda akan disorot.
| Kerangka Kerja Terpadu untuk Riset Implementasi (CFIR)× | RE-AIM Framework× | |
|---|---|---|
| Bidang | Ilmu Implementasi | Ilmu Implementasi |
| Keluarga | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Tahun asal≠ | 2009 | 1999 |
| Pencetus≠ | Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., et al. | Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., and colleagues |
| Tipe | Framework | Framework |
| Sumber perintis≠ | Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowson, E. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50. DOI ↗ | Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1322-1327. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | CFIR, CFIR model, consolidated framework | RE-AIM, REAIM, Glasgow framework |
| Terkait | 5 | 5 |
| Ringkasan≠ | The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a five-domain model designed to systematically evaluate the factors influencing implementation success of evidence-based interventions in health systems. Developed by Damschroder et al. (2009) and refined through extensive use across health domains, CFIR provides a structured vocabulary and taxonomy of 39 constructs that identify implementation barriers and facilitators across intervention characteristics, organizational context, individual factors, and implementation process. | The RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) is a five-dimension evaluation tool designed to assess the public health impact of evidence-based interventions in real-world settings. Developed by Glasgow et al. (1999) to address the gap between efficacy trials (controlled conditions) and effectiveness in practice, RE-AIM provides a comprehensive set of metrics to determine whether an intervention is 'worth it' from both scientific and practical perspectives. It has become the standard framework for evaluating implementation success across health domains. |
| ScholarGateSet data ↗ |
|
|