Módszerek összehasonlítása
Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.
| Two-Level Game Analysis× | Veto Player Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tudományterület | Political Science | Political Science |
| Módszercsalád | MCDM | MCDM |
| Keletkezés éve≠ | 1988 | 1995 |
| Megalkotó≠ | Robert D. Putnam | George Tsebelis |
| Típus≠ | Framework for analyzing international negotiation under domestic constraints | Comparative institutional analysis framework |
| Alapmű≠ | Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization, 42(3), 427-460. DOI ↗ | Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691091891 |
| Alternatív nevek | Two-Level Games, Putnam Two-Level Game Framework, Win-Set Analysis, Double-Edged Diplomacy | Veto Players Theory, Veto Points Analysis, Tsebelis Veto Player Framework, Policy Stability Analysis |
| Kapcsolódó | 4 | 4 |
| Összefoglaló≠ | Two-level game analysis is a framework introduced by Robert Putnam in 1988 for understanding how international negotiations are jointly shaped by bargaining between governments and the need to win domestic approval. A negotiator plays simultaneously at two tables: Level I, where states bargain over an agreement, and Level II, where that agreement must be ratified by domestic constituents. The key analytic device is the win-set — the set of Level I deals that could secure domestic ratification — and an agreement is possible only where the negotiating states' win-sets overlap. | Veto player analysis is a spatial-institutional framework, developed by George Tsebelis in his 1995 article and 2002 book, for predicting the capacity of a political system to change policy. A veto player is any individual or collective actor whose agreement is required to alter the status quo. The theory shows that the potential for policy change shrinks as the number of veto players grows, as the ideological distance between them widens, and as their internal cohesion increases — three structural variables that together determine a system's policy stability independently of constitutional labels such as presidentialism or parliamentarism. |
| ScholarGateAdatkészlet ↗ |
|
|