Módszerek összehasonlítása
Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.
| Relative Deprivation Scale× | Collective Action Tendency Measurement (SIMCA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tudományterület | Politikai pszichológia | Politikai pszichológia |
| Módszercsalád | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Keletkezés éve≠ | 1966 | 2008 |
| Megalkotó≠ | Walter Runciman; Heather Smith & Thomas Pettigrew | Martijn van Zomeren, Tom Postmes & Russell Spears |
| Típus≠ | Self-report perception scale | Self-report multi-construct measure |
| Alapmű≠ | Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203-232. DOI ↗ | van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504-535. DOI ↗ |
| Alternatív nevek | RD Scale, Fraternal Relative Deprivation Scale, Group Relative Deprivation Measure | SIMCA, Collective Action Scale, Protest Intention Measure |
| Kapcsolódó | 4 | 4 |
| Összefoglaló≠ | The Relative Deprivation Scale measures the subjective sense that one's own group (fraternal/group relative deprivation) or oneself (egoistic/individual relative deprivation) is unjustly worse off than a relevant comparison standard, accompanied by feelings of resentment. Building on Runciman (1966) and synthesized by Smith and colleagues (2012), it captures the three-component process, cognitive comparison, appraisal of injustice, and affective resentment, that links inequality to political action. | Collective action tendency measurement, organized by the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (SIMCA; van Zomeren, Postmes and Spears, 2008), assesses the psychological predictors of willingness to engage in protest and group-based political action: perceived injustice (especially group-based anger), group efficacy, and politicized social identity. SIMCA integrates these three traditions into a structural model in which identity drives action both directly and through injustice and efficacy. |
| ScholarGateAdatkészlet ↗ |
|
|