ScholarGate
Asszisztens

Módszerek összehasonlítása

Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.

Pragmatikus randomizált klinikai vizsgálat×Multiközpontú randomizált klinikai vizsgálat×
TudományterületEpidemiológiaEpidemiológia
MódszercsaládProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Keletkezés éve19671970s–1980s (widespread adoption for large-scale efficacy trials)
MegalkotóDaniel Schwartz & Joseph LellouchEvolved from single-center RCT methodology; consolidated through landmark trials such as the MRC streptomycin trial (1948) and large cardiovascular mega-trials of the 1970s–1980s
TípusInterventional study designInterventional experimental design
AlapműSchwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185385
Alternatív nevekpragmatic RCT, effectiveness trial, real-world RCT, practical clinical trialmulti-site RCT, multicenter RCT, multinational randomized trial, multicenter controlled trial
Kapcsolódó66
ÖsszefoglalóA pragmatic randomized clinical trial (pragmatic RCT) is an interventional study that tests whether a treatment works under routine clinical conditions, as opposed to the tightly controlled setting of an explanatory trial. It prioritizes broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and patient-relevant outcomes to answer the question 'Does this treatment work in everyday practice?' rather than 'Can this treatment work under ideal circumstances?' The distinction between pragmatic and explanatory trials was formally articulated by Schwartz and Lellouch in 1967 and operationalized by the PRECIS tool in 2009.A multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) is an experimental study in which eligible participants are randomly assigned to intervention or control arms simultaneously across two or more clinical sites. By combining the rigor of randomization with enrollment from geographically or institutionally diverse centers, this design produces large samples and externally valid effect estimates that single-center trials rarely achieve. It is the regulatory gold standard for confirmatory efficacy and safety evaluation of new treatments.
ScholarGateAdatkészlet
  1. v1
  2. 2 Források
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Források
  3. PUBLISHED

Ugrás a kereséshez Diák letöltése

ScholarGateMódszerek összehasonlítása: Pragmatic randomized clinical trial · Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Letöltve 2026-06-19, forrás: https://scholargate.app/hu/compare