ScholarGate
Asszisztens

Módszerek összehasonlítása

Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.

Participatory Poverty Assessment×Wealth Ranking×
TudományterületDevelopment StudiesAnthropology
MódszercsaládProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Keletkezés éve20001994
MegalkotóWorld Bank (Deepa Narayan; Caroline Robb); building on Robert Chambers's participatory traditionParticipatory Rural Appraisal tradition (Robert Chambers and colleagues)
TípusParticipatory qualitative poverty analysis methodParticipatory stratification of households by locally defined wealth or wellbeing
AlapműNarayan, D., Patel, R., Schafft, K., Rademacher, A., & Koch-Schulte, S. (2000). Voices of the Poor: Can Anyone Hear Us? New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank. ISBN: 9780195216011Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969. DOI ↗
Alternatív nevekPPA, Participatory Poverty Study, Voices of the Poor Method, Participatory Poverty DiagnosisWellbeing Ranking, Wealth Ranking Card Sort, Social Stratification Ranking, Wealth Grouping
Kapcsolódó44
ÖsszefoglalóA Participatory Poverty Assessment (PPA) is an instrument for understanding poverty from the perspective of poor people themselves, using participatory methods to elicit their own definitions, experiences, and priorities rather than imposing externally fixed indicators. Pioneered by the World Bank in the 1990s and made famous by the multi-country 'Voices of the Poor' study, the PPA combines participatory rural appraisal tools with a deliberate concern to influence policy, complementing rather than replacing the quantitative household surveys on which official poverty measurement rests.Wealth ranking is a participatory rural appraisal technique in which knowledgeable community members sort cards representing local households into a set of wealth or wellbeing strata that they themselves define. Several informants each perform the sort independently, and because they may use different numbers of piles, their placements are converted to a common scale and averaged into a relative wealth score for every household. The procedure produces both a stratification of the community and, crucially, the local (emic) criteria people actually use to judge who is poor and who is well off.
ScholarGateAdatkészlet
  1. v1
  2. 2 Források
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Források
  3. PUBLISHED

Ugrás a kereséshez Diák letöltése

ScholarGateMódszerek összehasonlítása: Participatory Poverty Assessment · Wealth Ranking. Letöltve 2026-06-25, forrás: https://scholargate.app/hu/compare