Módszerek összehasonlítása

	Longitudinal Constructivist Grounded Theory	Az „építkező egyszerelemzés” (Constructivist Grounded Theory) módszertana
Tudományterület	Kvalitatív módszerek	Kvalitatív módszerek
Módszercsalád	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Keletkezés éve	2006 (Charmaz's constructivist GT); longitudinal application from ~2000s onward	2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967)
Megalkotó	Kathy Charmaz (constructivist GT); extended to longitudinal designs by qualitative longitudinal researchers	Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967)
Típus	Qualitative research design and analysis approach	Qualitative research method
Alapmű	Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973522	Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539
Alternatív nevek	longitudinal CGT, constructivist GT longitudinal, longitudinal Charmaz grounded theory, temporal constructivist grounded theory	CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory
Kapcsolódó	5	6
Összefoglaló	Longitudinal Constructivist Grounded Theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist variant of grounded theory — which foregrounds the co-construction of meaning between researcher and participants — with a multi-wave, time-extended data collection design. Rather than capturing a single snapshot, the researcher returns to the same participants across two or more time points, allowing the emergent theory to track how processes, identities, and social meanings develop, shift, or stabilise over time.	Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated.