Módszerek összehasonlítása
Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.
| Történeti levéltári kutatás – elsődleges forrásvizsgálat× | Hermeneutikai elemzés× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tudományterület | Terepi módszerek | Terepi módszerek |
| Módszercsalád | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Keletkezés éve≠ | 19th century (formalized ~1820s–1880s) | 19th–20th century (Schleiermacher ~1819; Dilthey ~1883; Gadamer 1960; Ricoeur 1969) |
| Megalkotó≠ | Historians and archivists; systematised through the professionalization of historical scholarship in the 19th century | Friedrich Schleiermacher; Wilhelm Dilthey; Hans-Georg Gadamer; Paul Ricoeur |
| Típus≠ | Qualitative primary-source research | Qualitative interpretive method |
| Alapmű≠ | Hill, M. R. (1993). Archival Strategies and Techniques. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0803951853 | Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method (G. Barden & J. Cumming, Trans.). Seabury Press. (Original work published 1960 as Wahrheit und Methode). ISBN: 978-0826400185 |
| Alternatív nevek | archival research, historical document analysis, archival history, primary source research | hermeneutics, hermeneutical interpretation, interpretive hermeneutics, philosophical hermeneutics |
| Kapcsolódó | 6 | 6 |
| Összefoglaló≠ | Historical archival research is a systematic method of investigating the past through the critical examination of primary source documents preserved in archives, libraries, and institutional collections. Researchers locate, access, authenticate, and interpret original records — such as government documents, correspondence, diaries, maps, and institutional files — to reconstruct events, trace processes, and build evidence-based historical arguments. It is foundational to historiography and widely applied across humanities and social science disciplines. | Hermeneutic analysis is a qualitative interpretive method for uncovering the meaning of texts, documents, spoken discourse, or human actions. Rooted in 19th-century biblical and legal scholarship and systematised by Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Gadamer, and Ricoeur, it operates through the hermeneutic circle: the meaning of a part is understood through the whole, and the meaning of the whole is revised as parts are interpreted. The goal is not to measure or code, but to achieve a deepening, dialogic understanding of the object of interpretation. |
| ScholarGateAdatkészlet ↗ |
|
|