Módszerek összehasonlítása
Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.
| Programmértékelés terepmunka-alapon× | Program Evaluation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tudományterület | Terepi módszerek | Terepi módszerek |
| Módszercsalád | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Keletkezés éve≠ | 1970s–1980s (field methods integration with evaluation practice) | 1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971) |
| Megalkotó≠ | Michael Q. Patton; Peter H. Rossi and Howard E. Freeman | Michael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi |
| Típus≠ | Applied evaluation research | Applied evaluation methodology |
| Alapmű≠ | Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761908944 | Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944 |
| Alternatív nevek | naturalistic program evaluation, field evaluation, on-site program evaluation, field-based evaluation | evaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation |
| Kapcsolódó≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Összefoglaló≠ | Field-based program evaluation is an applied research method that assesses the implementation, outcomes, and value of a program by collecting data directly in the natural setting where the program operates. Rather than relying solely on administrative records or remote surveys, evaluators embed themselves in the field — observing activities, interviewing stakeholders on-site, and reviewing context-specific documents — to produce evidence-grounded judgments about program merit and worth. | Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes. |
| ScholarGateAdatkészlet ↗ |
|
|