Módszerek összehasonlítása
Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.
| Digitális dokumentumelemzés× | Digitális etnográfia – Kultúrakutatás online környezetben× | Diskurzusanalízis× | Dokumentumanalízis× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tudományterület≠ | Kvalitatív módszerek | Kvalitatív módszerek | Kvalitatív kutatás | Kvalitatív kutatás |
| Módszercsalád | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Keletkezés éve≠ | 2000s onward (grounded in earlier document analysis traditions) | Late 1990s – 2000s | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) | 1920 |
| Megalkotó≠ | Adapted from traditional document analysis; digital variant developed by qualitative researchers across disciplines (e.g., Bowen 2009; Prior 2003) | Christine Hine (virtual ethnography); Robert V. Kozinets (netnography) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell | Max Weber and Karl Mannheim |
| Típus≠ | Qualitative data analysis method | Qualitative research method | Method | Method |
| Alapmű≠ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ | Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage. ISBN: 978-1847875228 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ | Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419 |
| Alternatív nevek≠ | online document analysis, digital text analysis, e-document analysis, digital archival analysis | online ethnography, virtual ethnography, internet ethnography, netnography | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis | documentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research |
| Kapcsolódó≠ | 6 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| Összefoglaló≠ | Digital document analysis is a qualitative method for systematically locating, appraising, and interpreting documents that exist in digital or online form — including websites, emails, institutional reports, policy files, social media content, and digital archives. It applies the established logic of document analysis to born-digital and digitised sources, enabling researchers to examine meaning, discourse, and institutional practice embedded in contemporary digital texts without recruiting participants. | Digital ethnography is a qualitative research method that adapts traditional ethnographic fieldwork to online and digitally mediated settings. Drawing on sustained participant observation, document collection, and sometimes interviews, the researcher immerses themselves in one or more digital communities — social media platforms, forums, gaming spaces, or messaging groups — to understand how culture, identity, and social practice are constructed through digital interaction. The approach recognises that online spaces are not merely reflections of offline life but distinctive sites of cultural production in their own right. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. | Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice. |
| ScholarGateAdatkészlet ↗ |
|
|
|
|