Módszerek összehasonlítása
Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.
| Kritikai diskurzusanalízis× | Tartalomelemzés× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tudományterület | Kvalitatív módszerek | Kvalitatív módszerek |
| Módszercsalád | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Keletkezés éve≠ | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) | Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018 |
| Megalkotó≠ | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak | Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research |
| Típus≠ | Qualitative research method | Qualitative / mixed-method research technique |
| Alapmű≠ | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ | Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661 |
| Alternatív nevek≠ | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis | İçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis |
| Kapcsolódó≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Összefoglaló≠ | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. | Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material. |
| ScholarGateAdatkészlet ↗ |
|
|