ScholarGate
Asszisztens

Módszerek összehasonlítása

Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.

Komplex Proporcionális Értékelés×Analitikus Hierarchia Folyamat×Analytic Network Process (AHP visszacsatolással és kölcsönhatásokkal)×Legjobb-Legrosszabb Módszer×Bayes-féle BWM×
TudományterületDöntéshozatalDöntéshozatalDöntéshozatalDöntéshozatalDöntéshozatal
MódszercsaládMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDM
Keletkezés éve19961980199620152020
MegalkotóZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Saaty, T. L.Saaty, T. L.Rezaei, J.Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J.
TípusProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LPHierarchical Dirichlet posterior over weights via MCMC (JAGS) — group decision
AlapműZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J. (2020). Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model. Omega DOI ↗
Alternatív nevek
Kapcsolódó88888
ÖsszefoglalóCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM-BAYESIAN (Bayesian BWM — Probabilistic Group Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateAdatkészlet
  1. v1
  2. 1 Források
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Források
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Források
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Források
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Források
  3. PUBLISHED

Ugrás a kereséshez Diák letöltése

ScholarGateMódszerek összehasonlítása: COPRAS · AHP · ANP · BWM · BWM-BAYESIAN. Letöltve 2026-06-19, forrás: https://scholargate.app/hu/compare