Módszerek összehasonlítása
Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.
| Comparative Narrative Research× | Összehasonlító tematikus elemzés× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tudományterület | Kvalitatív módszerek | Kvalitatív módszerek |
| Módszercsalád | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Keletkezés éve≠ | 1990s–2000s | 2000s–2010s (as an explicit comparative variant of thematic analysis) |
| Megalkotó≠ | D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry); comparative extension by the broader qualitative comparative tradition | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis foundation); comparative extension developed in applied policy and cross-cultural qualitative research traditions |
| Típus≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative analytical strategy |
| Alapmű≠ | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943523 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Alternatív nevek | comparative narrative inquiry, cross-case narrative research, narrative comparison, comparative narrative analysis | cross-group thematic analysis, comparative TA, multi-group thematic analysis, comparative qualitative thematic analysis |
| Kapcsolódó | 6 | 6 |
| Összefoglaló≠ | Comparative narrative research is a qualitative design that collects personal stories or life accounts from two or more participants, groups, or contexts and systematically compares them to reveal patterns, contrasts, and contextual influences. Drawing on narrative inquiry's attention to experience-as-story, it adds a deliberate comparative logic to identify what is shared, what diverges, and why differences emerge across cases. | Comparative Thematic Analysis applies the structured procedures of thematic analysis across two or more distinct groups, sites, or time points, with the explicit aim of identifying both shared patterns and meaningful differences. Rather than producing a single composite account of experience, it yields a layered analysis that maps where themes converge and diverge across comparison units — making it especially valuable for policy-relevant, cross-cultural, or multi-site qualitative studies. |
| ScholarGateAdatkészlet ↗ |
|
|