ScholarGate
Asszisztens

Módszerek összehasonlítása

Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.

Összehasonlító grounded theory×Összehasonlító tematikus elemzés×
TudományterületKvalitatív módszerekKvalitatív módszerek
MódszercsaládProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Keletkezés éve1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward2000s–2010s (as an explicit comparative variant of thematic analysis)
MegalkotóBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholarsVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis foundation); comparative extension developed in applied policy and cross-cultural qualitative research traditions
TípusQualitative comparative research designQualitative comparative analytical strategy
AlapműGlaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Alternatív nevekcross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysiscross-group thematic analysis, comparative TA, multi-group thematic analysis, comparative qualitative thematic analysis
Kapcsolódó66
ÖsszefoglalóComparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies.Comparative Thematic Analysis applies the structured procedures of thematic analysis across two or more distinct groups, sites, or time points, with the explicit aim of identifying both shared patterns and meaningful differences. Rather than producing a single composite account of experience, it yields a layered analysis that maps where themes converge and diverge across comparison units — making it especially valuable for policy-relevant, cross-cultural, or multi-site qualitative studies.
ScholarGateAdatkészlet
  1. v1
  2. 2 Források
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Források
  3. PUBLISHED

Ugrás a kereséshez Diák letöltése

ScholarGateMódszerek összehasonlítása: Comparative grounded theory · Comparative Thematic Analysis. Letöltve 2026-06-18, forrás: https://scholargate.app/hu/compare