Módszerek összehasonlítása
Tekintse át a kiválasztott módszereket egymás mellett; az eltérő sorok kiemelve jelennek meg.
| Összehasonlító autoetnográfia× | Összehasonlító etnográfia – Több helyszínen végzett etnográfiai kutatás× | |
|---|---|---|
| Tudományterület | Kvalitatív módszerek | Kvalitatív módszerek |
| Módszercsalád | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Keletkezés éve≠ | 1979 (autoethnography); comparative application formalized ~2013 | 1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized) |
| Megalkotó≠ | Hayano (term); developed further by Ellis, Bochner, Chang, Ngunjiri & Hernandez | George E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic) |
| Típus≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Alapmű≠ | Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1598745948 | Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗ |
| Alternatív nevek | collaborative autoethnography, multi-sited autoethnography, cross-cultural autoethnography, CAE | multi-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observation |
| Kapcsolódó | 6 | 6 |
| Összefoglaló≠ | Comparative autoethnography is a qualitative design in which two or more researchers — or research participants — independently produce first-person self-narratives about a shared phenomenon and then systematically compare those accounts to generate broader cultural insight. By juxtaposing lived experiences that differ by context, identity, or setting, the approach moves beyond the single-voice limitations of traditional autoethnography while retaining its hallmark reflexivity and personal depth. | Comparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone. |
| ScholarGateAdatkészlet ↗ |
|
|