Zapis dokaza metode

Democratic Peace Analysis

Democratic peace analysis is the empirical study of the proposition that democracies rarely or never fight one another. Building on the dyadic research design crystallized by Maoz and Russett (1993), it codes the regime type of each state, constructs dyad-years, and models the probability of militarized conflict as a function of joint democracy alongside controls for power, contiguity, alliances, and trade. The approach has produced one of the most robust empirical regularities in international relations and a long debate over whether shared norms or institutional structures account for it.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Izvorni zapis

Citati kopirani doslovno iz izvornog zapisa metode. Ne impliciraju nikakvu provjeru na razini tvrdnje.

Empirical Analysis of the Democratic Peace

Taksonomski zapis metode · process-pipeline / international-relations

Maoz, Z., & Russett, B. (1993). Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 624–638. · DOI 10.2307/2938740

Otvori cijelu metodu

Uređene tvrdnje

Tvrdnje pohranjene u knjigu dokaza, svaka s vlastitom procjenom.

Nema uređenih tvrdnji

Ovaj prikaz ne izmišlja procjenu tvrdnje kada knjiga dokaza nema nijednu.

Povezane metode

Generirano iz grafa metode i prikazano kao strojno predložene relacije — ne implicira se nikakva tvrdnja dokaza.

Taxonomic bucketDyadic Conflict Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMilitarized Interstate Dispute Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPolity Score Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.