Prijeđi na sadržajScholarGate
KnjižnicaMoja knjižnicaStolReview StudioAsistent
Prijavite se
Affective Events Theory/Dokaz
Zapis dokaza metode

Affective Events Theory

Affective Events Theory (AET) is the macro framework that reoriented organizational research toward emotions and the events that cause them. Proposed by Howard Weiss and Russell Cropanzano in 1996, it argues that features of the work environment give rise to discrete events — daily hassles and uplifts — that trigger affective reactions, and that these momentary emotions, not just stable attitudes, drive how people behave at work. The theory's central insight is to distinguish affect-driven behaviors, which flow directly from emotional states, from judgment-driven behaviors, which flow from evaluative attitudes like job satisfaction. It also positions dispositions, such as trait affectivity, as shaping how strongly people react to events. Weiss and Beal's 2005 reflection clarified the theory's structure and its methodological demands, especially the need for within-person, over-time data. AET supplied the conceptual rationale for the experience-sampling and diary revolution in organizational behavior.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Izvorni zapis

Citati kopirani doslovno iz izvornog zapisa metode. Ne impliciraju nikakvu provjeru na razini tvrdnje.

Affective Events Theory (How Workplace Events Generate Emotions That Shape Attitudes and Behavior)
Taksonomski zapis metode · process-pipeline / organizational-behavior
  • Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1-74. · ISBN 9781559389389
  • Weiss, H. M., & Beal, D. J. (2005). Reflections on affective events theory. In N. M. Ashkanasy, W. J. Zerbe, & C. E. J. Härtel (Eds.), Research on Emotion in Organizations, Vol. 1: The Effect of Affect in Organizational Settings (pp. 1-21). Emerald. · DOI 10.1016/S1746-9791(05)01101-6
Otvori cijelu metodu

Uređene tvrdnje

Tvrdnje pohranjene u knjigu dokaza, svaka s vlastitom procjenom.

Nema uređenih tvrdnji

Ovaj prikaz ne izmišlja procjenu tvrdnje kada knjiga dokaza nema nijednu.

Povezane metode

Generirano iz grafa metode i prikazano kao strojno predložene relacije — ne implicira se nikakva tvrdnja dokaza.

Used in the same domainEmotional Labor Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainPsychological Contract Measurementmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyUtrecht Work Engagement Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Status dokaza

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Izvori

2 zabilježenih citata, kopiranih iz izvornog zapisa metode.

Akcije

Otvori stranicu metode
ScholarGate

Referentna knjižnica istraživačkih metoda usmjerena na sadržaj — što je svaka metoda, kako funkcionira i odakle potječe.

Otvoreni podaci (CC-BY)

Otkrij

  • Knjižnica
  • Pretražite metode…
  • Pregled po područjima
  • Područja
  • Put
  • Usporedi
  • Koja metoda?

Referenca

  • Područja
  • Atlas
  • Pojmovnik
  • Metodologija
  • Filozofija

Radni prostor

  • Moja knjižnica
  • Stol
  • Razgovor

Tvrtka

  • O nama
  • Cijene
  • Kontakt
  • Predložite metodu

Unosi su sastavljeni iz objavljenih izvora u referentne svrhe. Provjera točnosti i prikladnosti svake informacije za vašu vlastitu upotrebu ostaje vaša odgovornost.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Referentna knjižnica istraživačkih metoda
  • Privatnost
  • Kolačići
  • Uvjeti korištenja
  • Izbriši račun