विधियों की तुलना करें

	विश्वास चिकित्सक पैमाना (Trust in Physician Scale - TPS)	रोगी-रिपोर्टेड संचार पैमाना
क्षेत्र	रोगी-केंद्रित देखभाल	रोगी-केंद्रित देखभाल
परिवार	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
उद्भव वर्ष	1990	2009
प्रवर्तक	Laurie Anderson, Robert Dedrick	Marianne Haskard Zolnierek, Roxane Dimateo
प्रकार	Patient-reported	Patient-reported
मौलिक स्रोत	Anderson, L. A., & Dedrick, R. F. (1990). Development of the Trust in Physician Scale: A measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships. Psychological Reports, 67(3), 1091-1100.	Haskard Zolnierek, K. B., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2009). Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Medical Care, 47(8), 826-834.
उपनाम	TPS, Interpersonal Trust Measure, Patient-Provider Trust Scale	PRCS Clinician Communication, Communication Quality Scale
संबंधित	4	4
सारांश	The Trust in Physician Scale (TPS) is an 11-item self-report instrument that measures the degree to which a patient trusts their physician, including dimensions of confidentiality, competence, honesty, and care. Developed by Anderson and Dedrick in 1990, the TPS assesses the patient's confidence that the physician acts in the patient's best interest, respects privacy, possesses the needed expertise, and is truthful. Trust in the physician-patient relationship is foundational to healthcare engagement and is strongly correlated with adherence, disclosure of sensitive information, and health outcomes. The TPS is widely used in research, quality improvement, and studies examining factors that build or erode physician trust.	The Patient-Reported Communication Scale (PRCS) is a brief, validated instrument that measures patients' perceptions of clinician communication quality in healthcare encounters. Developed through meta-analytic research by Haskard Zolnierek and DiMatteo, the PRCS assesses key dimensions of effective patient-clinician communication: clarity of explanations, listening, showing respect and empathy, and addressing patient concerns. The scale is used to evaluate clinician communication competence, identify training needs, and correlate communication quality with patient adherence, satisfaction, and health outcomes.