विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| Systematic Review× | मूल शोध लेख× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | शैक्षणिक लेखन | शैक्षणिक लेखन |
| परिवार | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 1992 | 1665 |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Cochrane Collaboration (1992) | Scientific research community |
| प्रकार | Document Type | Document Type |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ | International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. ICMJE. link ↗ |
| उपनाम | systematic literature review, evidence synthesis, scoping review, mapping review | research paper, empirical article, primary research, journal article |
| संबंधित≠ | 3 | 5 |
| सारांश≠ | A systematic review is a structured, transparent synthesis of all available evidence addressing a specific research question. Unlike narrative reviews, systematic reviews employ comprehensive database searches, predefined selection criteria, quality assessment, and rigorous reporting (PRISMA guideline). The Cochrane Collaboration (founded 1992) established this methodology as the gold standard for evidence synthesis in healthcare and social sciences. | An original research article is the primary vehicle for reporting new empirical findings in a discipline. Following the IMRaD structure (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion), it represents a researcher's novel data, analysis, and interpretation. The journal article format has been the gold standard for scientific communication since the establishment of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society in 1665. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|