ScholarGate
सहायक

विधियों की तुलना करें

चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।

शिक्षा अनुसंधान में कारणता के लिए संवेदनशीलता विश्लेषण×मिलान विधियाँ (CEM / इष्टतम / आनुवंशिक)×
क्षेत्रकारणात्मक अनुमानकारणात्मक अनुमान
परिवारRegression modelRegression model
उद्भव वर्ष1983–20022012
प्रवर्तकPaul R. Rosenbaum (formal framework); applied in education research by Briggs and othersIacus, King & Porro (CEM); Hansen (optimal/full matching)
प्रकारCausal robustness / bias assessmentMatching for causal inference
मौलिक स्रोतRosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗
उपनामRosenbaum sensitivity analysis, hidden-bias sensitivity analysis, causal sensitivity analysis, SA for causal education studiescoarsened exact matching, optimal matching, genetic matching, CEM
संबंधित65
सारांशSensitivity analysis for causality in education research tests how robust a quasi-experimental finding is to unmeasured confounding. Rather than assuming all bias has been removed, it quantifies how large a hidden bias would need to be to overturn a causal conclusion — a critical safeguard when randomisation is impossible, which is common in educational settings.Matching Methods are a family of causal-inference techniques beyond propensity-score matching that pair treated and control units with similar covariates so that a treatment effect can be read off the balanced sample. The family includes Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012), optimal matching, and genetic matching.
ScholarGateडेटासेट
  1. v1
  2. 2 स्रोत
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 स्रोत
  3. PUBLISHED

खोज पर जाएँ स्लाइड डाउनलोड करें

ScholarGateविधियों की तुलना करें: Sensitivity analysis for causality in education research · Matching Methods. 2026-06-18 को यहाँ से प्राप्त https://scholargate.app/hi/compare