विधियों की तुलना करें

	स्मरण (संवेदनशीलता)	संतुलित सटीकता (Balanced Accuracy)	एफ1-स्कोर	सटीकता (Precision)
क्षेत्र	मॉडल मूल्यांकन	मॉडल मूल्यांकन	मॉडल मूल्यांकन	मॉडल मूल्यांकन
परिवार	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
उद्भव वर्ष	20th century	2010	1979	20th century
प्रवर्तक	Historical statistical foundations	Brodersen, Ong, Stephan, and Buhmann	C. J. van Rijsbergen	Historical statistical foundations
प्रकार	Evaluation metric	Evaluation metric	Evaluation metric	Evaluation metric
मौलिक स्रोत	Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874.	Brodersen, K. H., Ong, C. S., Stephan, K. E., & Buhmann, J. M. (2010). The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 3121-3124.	van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1979). Information Retrieval (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.	Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874.
उपनाम	Sensitivity, True Positive Rate, TPR	Average Recall, Equal-weight Average Sensitivity	F-measure, Harmonic Mean	Positive Predictive Value, PPV
संबंधित	5	5	5	5
सारांश	Recall measures the proportion of actual positive cases that were correctly identified by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly positive, how many did we find?' Recall is critical in scenarios where missing positive cases is costly.	Balanced accuracy is the average of recall values computed for each class separately. It corrects for class imbalance by giving equal weight to the performance on each class, regardless of class frequency in the dataset.	The F1-score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a single metric that balances both concerns. It was introduced by van Rijsbergen in information retrieval and has become a standard metric for evaluating classification models where both precision and recall are important.	Precision measures the proportion of positive predictions that were actually correct. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases we predicted as positive, how many were truly positive?' Precision is critical in scenarios where false positives are costly.