विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| मूल शोध लेख× | Systematic Review× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | शैक्षणिक लेखन | शैक्षणिक लेखन |
| परिवार | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 1665 | 1992 |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Scientific research community | Cochrane Collaboration (1992) |
| प्रकार | Document Type | Document Type |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. ICMJE. link ↗ | Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ |
| उपनाम | research paper, empirical article, primary research, journal article | systematic literature review, evidence synthesis, scoping review, mapping review |
| संबंधित≠ | 5 | 3 |
| सारांश≠ | An original research article is the primary vehicle for reporting new empirical findings in a discipline. Following the IMRaD structure (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion), it represents a researcher's novel data, analysis, and interpretation. The journal article format has been the gold standard for scientific communication since the establishment of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society in 1665. | A systematic review is a structured, transparent synthesis of all available evidence addressing a specific research question. Unlike narrative reviews, systematic reviews employ comprehensive database searches, predefined selection criteria, quality assessment, and rigorous reporting (PRISMA guideline). The Cochrane Collaboration (founded 1992) established this methodology as the gold standard for evidence synthesis in healthcare and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|