विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| बहुचर कारण-तुलनात्मक अनुसंधान× | कारण-तुलनात्मक अनुसंधान× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | अनुसंधान अभिकल्प | अनुसंधान अभिकल्प |
| परिवार | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | Mid-20th century onward; multivariate extension systematized 1970s–1990s | 1964 |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Extension of causal-comparative tradition (cf. Chapin, 1947; Gay, Mills & Airasian) | Fred N. Kerlinger |
| प्रकार≠ | Quantitative non-experimental comparative design | Non-experimental quantitative research design |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-1260085594 | Kerlinger, F. N. (1964). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. link ↗ |
| उपनाम | multivariate causal-comparative design, MANOVA causal-comparative study, multi-outcome ex post facto research, multivariate ex post facto design | ex post facto research, causal-comparative design, retrospective causal study, CCR |
| संबंधित≠ | 6 | 3 |
| सारांश≠ | Multivariate causal-comparative research is a quantitative, non-experimental design that investigates whether pre-existing group differences (defined by a naturally occurring categorical variable) are associated with differences across multiple outcome variables considered simultaneously. By extending the classic causal-comparative framework to several dependent variables at once, it reduces Type I error inflation and captures the correlated structure of outcomes that univariate comparisons would miss. | Causal-comparative research is a non-experimental quantitative design in which the researcher compares two or more groups that already differ on an independent variable — one that was not manipulated — to investigate possible causes or consequences of that difference. Because group membership is pre-existing rather than randomly assigned, the design can suggest causal relationships but cannot establish them with the certainty of a true experiment. It is widely used in education, psychology, and social sciences when experimental manipulation is impractical or unethical. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|