विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| बहु-समूह पुष्टिकारी कारक विश्लेषण (MG-CFA)× | पुष्टिकारीय कारक विश्लेषण (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | मनोमिति | मनोमिति |
| परिवार | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 1971 | 1969 |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Karl Jöreskog | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| प्रकार≠ | Measurement model / invariance test | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| मौलिक स्रोत≠ | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| उपनाम | MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| संबंधित≠ | 6 | 4 |
| सारांश≠ | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|