विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| माइक्रो-औसत F1× | भारित F1× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | मॉडल मूल्यांकन | मॉडल मूल्यांकन |
| परिवार | MCDM | MCDM |
| उद्भव वर्ष | 2000s | 2000s |
| प्रवर्तक | Multi-class evaluation community | Multi-class evaluation community |
| प्रकार | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| मौलिक स्रोत | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ |
| उपनाम≠ | Micro F1, Frequency-weighted average F1 | Support-weighted F1 |
| संबंधित≠ | 4 | 3 |
| सारांश≠ | Micro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score by aggregating true positives, false positives, and false negatives across all classes, then calculating a single metric. It is equivalent to accuracy in multi-class classification and is useful when class distributions reflect their natural importance. | Weighted F1 computes the F1-score for each class and then takes a weighted average, where weights are proportional to the number of samples in each class (support). It provides a middle ground between macro and micro-averaging. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|