विधियों की तुलना करें
चुनी हुई विधियों की आमने-सामने समीक्षा करें; भिन्नता वाली पंक्तियाँ रेखांकित हैं।
| Ex Post Facto Design× | कारण-तुलनात्मक अनुसंधान× | |
|---|---|---|
| क्षेत्र | अनुसंधान अभिकल्प | अनुसंधान अभिकल्प |
| परिवार | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| उद्भव वर्ष≠ | 1960s (systematic codification); concept used in social science from early 20th century | 1964 |
| प्रवर्तक≠ | Formalized by Fred N. Kerlinger; foundational treatment by Donald T. Campbell and Julian C. Stanley | Fred N. Kerlinger |
| प्रकार | Non-experimental quantitative research design | Non-experimental quantitative research design |
| मौलिक स्रोत | Kerlinger, F. N. (1964). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. link ↗ | Kerlinger, F. N. (1964). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. link ↗ |
| उपनाम | after-the-fact research, retrospective non-experimental design, causal-comparative design, EPF design | ex post facto research, causal-comparative design, retrospective causal study, CCR |
| संबंधित | 3 | 3 |
| सारांश≠ | Ex post facto design is a non-experimental quantitative research approach in which the researcher investigates a phenomenon after it has already occurred, examining pre-existing differences between groups to explore potential causal or associative relationships. Because the independent variable cannot be manipulated — it happened in the past — the design relies on careful group selection, retrospective data collection, and statistical controls to approximate causal inference without experimental intervention. | Causal-comparative research is a non-experimental quantitative design in which the researcher compares two or more groups that already differ on an independent variable — one that was not manipulated — to investigate possible causes or consequences of that difference. Because group membership is pre-existing rather than randomly assigned, the design can suggest causal relationships but cannot establish them with the certainty of a true experiment. It is widely used in education, psychology, and social sciences when experimental manipulation is impractical or unethical. |
| ScholarGateडेटासेट ↗ |
|
|