Marxist Literary Theory
Marxist literary theory interprets literature in relation to class, history, and the economic organization of society, treating it as bound up with ideology and social conflict.
Definition
The branch of literary theory that analyzes literature as a social and ideological product shaped by, and intervening in, the class relations and historical conditions of its production.
Scope
This topic covers the tradition from Marx and Engels through Lukacs, the Frankfurt School, Goldmann, Althusser, and Macherey to anglophone critics such as Williams, Eagleton, and Jameson. It treats the base-and-superstructure model and its revisions, theories of realism and reification, the relation of ideology to literary form, and the idea that interpretation can recover the social and historical contradictions embedded in texts.
Core questions
- How is literature related to the economic base and class structure of society?
- Does literature reflect, mediate, or contest the dominant ideology?
- What is the political and cognitive value of literary realism?
- How can criticism read the historical contradictions latent in literary form?
Key theories
- Realism and totality
- Lukacs's argument that great realist literature renders the social totality and the typical, offering knowledge of historical reality that modernist fragmentation, in his view, forfeits.
- Structure of feeling and cultural materialism
- Williams's reworking of base and superstructure through concepts such as the 'structure of feeling', treating culture as a constitutive social practice rather than a mere reflection of the economy.
- Narrative as socially symbolic act
- Jameson's dialectical method of reading narratives as imaginary resolutions of real social contradictions, recovering a 'political unconscious' through successive interpretive horizons.
History
Marxist literary theory began with scattered remarks by Marx and Engels and was systematized by twentieth-century thinkers: Lukacs on realism, Adorno and Benjamin in the Frankfurt School, Goldmann on genetic structuralism, and Althusser and Macherey on ideology. From the 1970s, Williams, Eagleton, and Jameson developed influential anglophone versions, debating the relation of literature to ideology and history.
Debates
- Realism versus modernism
- The Lukacs-Brecht-Adorno debate over whether realism or modernist experiment better serves emancipatory ends and offers truer access to social reality.
- Determination by the economic base
- Disagreement over how strongly the economic base determines literature, ranging from reflectionist models to Williams's and Althusser's emphases on relative autonomy and complex mediation.
Key figures
- Georg Lukacs
- Raymond Williams
- Terry Eagleton
- Fredric Jameson
- Pierre Macherey
Related topics
Seminal works
- lukacs1971
- williams1977
- jameson1981
Frequently asked questions
- Is Marxist criticism only about a text's content?
- No; much Marxist theory, from Lukacs to Eagleton and Jameson, argues that literary form itself is historically and ideologically saturated, so analysis attends to form as well as explicit content.
- What is reification in literary terms?
- Reification, a concept from Lukacs, names the way social relations come to appear as fixed, thing-like givens; Marxist critics trace how literary works register or naturalize this process.