השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| מודל EGARCH של שבר מבני× | מבחן Zivot-Andrews לשבר מבני× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | אקונומטריקה | אקונומטריקה |
| משפחה | Regression model | Regression model |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1990–1991 | 1992 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Nelson (1991) for EGARCH; Lamoureux and Lastrapes (1990) for break-augmented GARCH variants | Eric Zivot and Donald W. K. Andrews |
| סוג≠ | Volatility model with structural breaks | Unit root test with endogenous structural break |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347–370. DOI ↗ | Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | SB-EGARCH, EGARCH with regime shifts, break-adjusted EGARCH, structural change EGARCH | ZA test, Zivot-Andrews unit root test, endogenous structural break unit root test, ZA structural break test |
| קשורות≠ | 5 | 6 |
| תקציר≠ | Structural Break EGARCH combines Nelson's Exponential GARCH framework with explicit allowance for one or more structural breaks in the volatility process. By letting the intercept and persistence parameters of the log-variance equation shift at detected break dates, the model avoids the spurious long-memory and inflated persistence that standard EGARCH suffers when the data contain regime changes. | The Zivot-Andrews (ZA) test is a unit root test that endogenously identifies the most likely location of a single structural break in a time series. Unlike the standard ADF test, it does not require the researcher to pre-specify when the break occurred, making it robust to data-driven regime shifts such as policy changes, financial crises, or major economic events. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|