השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| מבחן פלצבו מרחבי× | תכנון רגרסיה מרחבית של אי-רציפות (Spatial RDD)× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | הסקה סיבתית | הסקה סיבתית |
| משפחה | Regression model | Regression model |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2000s–2010s | 2010s |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Developed organically in spatial econometrics and geographic RDD literature; prominent use in Dell (2010) and related work | Popularized by Dell (2010); formalized for geographic boundaries by Keele & Titiunik (2015) |
| סוג≠ | Falsification / robustness check | Quasi-experimental causal inference |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Buonanno, P., Montolio, D., & Vanin, P. (2009). Does Social Capital Reduce Crime? Journal of Law and Economics, 52(1), 145-170. DOI ↗ | Dell, M. (2010). The Persistent Effects of Peru's Mining Mita. Econometrica, 78(6), 1863-1903. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | geographic placebo test, spatial falsification test, spatial robustness check, geographic spillover test | Spatial RDD, Geographic RDD, Border RD Design, Geographic Discontinuity Design |
| קשורות | 4 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | A spatial placebo test is a falsification check used in geographic or spatial causal-inference studies. The analyst applies the same estimation procedure to spatial units, boundaries, or zones where no treatment effect should exist — fake borders, shifted cutoffs, or buffer areas beyond spillover range — and checks whether a spurious effect emerges. A non-significant result in the placebo region supports the credibility of the main causal estimate. | Spatial Regression Discontinuity Design uses a geographic or administrative boundary as the threshold that assigns units to treatment. Observations just inside one side of the boundary are compared with those just outside it, exploiting the near-random variation in treatment status near the cutoff to recover a local causal effect. The approach is widely used in economics, political science, and public health when policies or institutions change sharply at a border. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|