ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

סקירת היקף×ניתוח ביבליומטרי×
תחוםסיינטומטריהסיינטומטריה
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור20051969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
הוגה השיטהHilary Arksey & Lisa O'MalleyAlan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
סוגEvidence synthesis review designQuantitative literature analysis
מקור מכונןArksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗
כינוייםscoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence mapbibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
קשורות66
תקצירA scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Scoping Review · Bibliometric Analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare