השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניתוח גודל אפקט רובסטי× | ניתוח עוצמה× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | סטטיסטיקה | סטטיסטיקה |
| משפחה | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2005 (formalized) | 1969 (1st ed.); 1988 (seminal 2nd ed.) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Algina, Keselman & Penfield; Wilcox | Jacob Cohen |
| סוג≠ | Robust effect size estimation | Sample size and power planning |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Algina, J., Keselman, H. J., & Penfield, R. D. (2005). An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: A robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 317–328. DOI ↗ | Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805802832 |
| כינויים | robust Cohen's d, trimmed-mean effect size, outlier-resistant effect size, robust standardized mean difference | sample size calculation, power calculation, sensitivity analysis, a priori power analysis |
| קשורות | 5 | 5 |
| תקציר≠ | Robust effect size analysis quantifies the magnitude of a difference or association using estimators that are resistant to outliers and violations of normality. Rather than relying on classical statistics such as Cohen's d based on sample means and standard deviations, robust variants use trimmed means and Winsorized standard deviations to produce effect size estimates that accurately reflect the typical effect rather than being inflated by extreme values. | Power analysis is a planning and evaluation technique that quantifies the probability of detecting a real effect of a given magnitude at a chosen significance level. It links four quantities — sample size, effect size, significance level (alpha), and statistical power (1 minus beta) — so that researchers can determine the sample size needed before data collection or evaluate the sensitivity of a completed study. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|