ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

Results-Based Accountability×Summative Evaluation×
תחוםPublic PolicyPublic Policy
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור20051967
הוגה השיטהMark FriedmanMichael Scriven
סוגPerformance accountability and measurement frameworkJudgement-oriented evaluation function
מקור מכונןFriedman, M. (2005). Trying Hard Is Not Good Enough: How to Produce Measurable Improvements for Customers and Communities. Victoria, BC: Trafford Publishing. ISBN: 9781439237861Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation (pp. 39–83). Chicago: Rand McNally. ISBN: 9780528616600
כינוייםRBA, Outcomes-Based Accountability, OBA, Friedman Results-Based AccountabilityOutcome Judgement Evaluation, Accountability Evaluation
קשורות44
תקצירResults-Based Accountability (RBA), also known as Outcomes-Based Accountability, is a disciplined performance framework developed by Mark Friedman and set out in his 2005 book Trying Hard Is Not Good Enough. It provides a simple, common-sense method for moving from talk about results to measurable action, organised around a sharp distinction between population accountability — the wellbeing of whole populations in a place — and performance accountability — how well a specific program, agency or service is doing. For each, RBA asks the same disciplined set of questions and drives toward concrete actions that 'turn the curve' on key indicators.Summative evaluation is evaluation conducted to render an overall judgement of a program, policy or product — its merit, worth, effectiveness or impact — typically after it has been implemented or has matured. Named by Michael Scriven in his 1967 essay 'The Methodology of Evaluation' as the counterpart to formative evaluation, its purpose is to inform consequential decisions: whether to continue, expand, replicate, defund or certify an intervention. It addresses the bottom-line question 'did it work, and was it worth it?' for audiences such as funders, policymakers and the public.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 1 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Results-Based Accountability · Summative Evaluation. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-24 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare