ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

ניתוח עוצמה למחקרי הישרדות×ניתוח עוצמה למבחני פרופורציות×
תחוםסטטיסטיקהסטטיסטיקה
משפחהHypothesis testHypothesis test
שנת המקור19811988
הוגה השיטהJacob Cohen
סוגSample size determination for survival outcomesSample size determination
מקור מכונןSchoenfeld, D. A. (1981). The asymptotic properties of nonparametric tests for comparing survival distributions. Biometrika, 68(1), 316–319. DOI ↗Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI ↗
כינוייםlog-rank power analysis, cox regression power analysis, survival power analysis, Sağkalım Analizi Güç Analiziproportion power analysis, two-proportion z-test power, z-test for proportions power, Oran Testi Güç Analizi
קשורות63
תקצירPower analysis for survival studies determines how many participants — and how many observed events — are required so that a log-rank test or Cox regression has a sufficient probability of detecting a clinically meaningful difference in survival between groups. The foundational formulas were derived by Schoenfeld (1981) and Lachin (1981) and remain the standard approach in clinical trial planning.Power analysis for proportion tests is a prospective sample-size planning method used to determine how many participants are needed to detect a meaningful difference between two (or one) proportions with a specified probability. Formalised by Jacob Cohen in his 1988 landmark text, it applies the arcsine transformation to convert proportions into the effect-size index h, enabling direct calculation of the required sample size.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Survival Analysis Power Analysis · Power Analysis for Proportions. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare