ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

פיתוח סולמות פוליטומיים×תורת הַכְּלָלִיּוּת (G-Theory)×
תחוםפסיכומטריהפסיכומטריה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור1969–19821963–1972
הוגה השיטהSamejima, F.; Masters, G. N. (independently)Lee J. Cronbach, Goldine Gleser, Harinder Nanda, Nageswari Rajaratnam
סוגPsychometric scale constructionVariance-components reliability model
מקור מכונןEmbretson, S. E. & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805828191Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H. & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. Wiley. link ↗
כינוייםpolytomous item development, ordered-category scale construction, rating scale development, multi-category item developmentG-theory, G-study / D-study framework, variance components reliability
קשורות64
תקצירPolytomous scale development is the systematic construction and validation of measurement instruments whose items have three or more ordered response categories — such as Likert-type, rating, or partial-credit items. It applies polytomous item response theory models or ordinal factor analysis methods to evaluate item quality, estimate latent trait levels, and build a psychometrically sound scale.Generalizability Theory is a psychometric framework that decomposes observed score variance into multiple sources — persons, items, raters, occasions, and their interactions — using analysis of variance. It replaces the single reliability coefficient of classical test theory with a family of coefficients that tell researchers how well scores generalize across different measurement conditions.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Polytomous scale development · Generalizability Theory. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare