השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| מודל מבני שולי להערכת מדיניות× | הערכת השפעה נגדית (Counterfactual Impact Evaluation - CIE)× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | הסקה סיבתית | הסקה סיבתית |
| משפחה | Regression model | Regression model |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2000 | 1970s–2000s |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | James M. Robins, Miguel A. Hernan, Babette Brumback | Heckman, Imbens, Rubin, and the program evaluation literature |
| סוג≠ | Causal inference / weighted regression | Causal inference / program evaluation |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550–560. DOI ↗ | Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2007). Econometric evaluation of social programs, Part I: Causal models, structural models and econometric policy evaluation. Handbook of Econometrics, 6B, 4779-4874. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | MSM for policy evaluation, policy MSM, causal MSM, structural policy weighting model | CIE, counterfactual evaluation, counterfactual policy evaluation, impact evaluation |
| קשורות≠ | 6 | 5 |
| תקציר≠ | A Policy Evaluation Marginal Structural Model (MSM) is a causal inference framework that estimates the population-average effect of a policy by using inverse probability weighting to create a pseudo-population in which treatment assignment is independent of measured confounders, enabling unbiased comparison of potential outcomes under different policy scenarios from observational data. | Counterfactual Impact Evaluation is a family of causal methods that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing what actually happened to participants with what would have happened had the intervention not taken place. Formalised in the Rubin Causal Model and extended by Heckman, Imbens and others, CIE underlies most modern program and policy evaluation practice. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|